Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navigating the Product Mindset


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No reasonable Keep rationales provided by SPAs Black Kite (talk) 01:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Navigating the Product Mindset

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nominated for speedy as promotional--perhaps not promotional in the usual sense, but it does not actually describe the study, or present the results, just gives buzzwords about it. Perhaps an article could be written, but this isn't encyclopedic.  DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not appear notable to me unless there is some evidence that the concept has truly been "popularized" as the article asserts. Not much as far as content, it merely feels like it is intended to drive readers to the firm's website. West Eddy (talk) 01:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Underwriters Laboratories, I agree with DGG, but it seems like a plausible search term.--kelapstick(bainuu) 01:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect, I agree with kelapstick. –Ugncreative Usergname (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Other studies have been included with similar purposes, including 'Country Brand Index,' and others. This content provides insights and findings into how consumers view products today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smcleanmblm (talk • contribs) 13:36, 10 April 2012 (UTC)  — Smcleanmblm (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. I agree with Smcleanmblm. This concept has clearly been popularized as demonstrated by the articles from varied members of the press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yhaouatis (talk • contribs) 15:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)  — Yhaouatis (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect - this is nothing but advertising, IMHO, created and maintained by a series of WP:COI editors. No real indications of notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:07, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I thought this looked familiar - it was speedy deleted last month as a copyvio. From the look of the article, that may still apply. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of acceptance of this idea or notability. Looks like advertising. 139.149.1.230 (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.