Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Mittal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Navin Mittal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: A Finance Secretary in the State Government (as opposed to a Secretary rank officer in the Government of India) is a mid level official. Has not won any significant awards to assert notability. Has held relatively junior level posts. Speedy Delete. Uncletomwood (talk) 11:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Despite the grand title the subject is a civil servant, rather than a politician, so he is not notable under WP:POLITICIAN by virtue of his position. If he is notable then it would have to be under the general notability guideline, which I haven't yet checked. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 16:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete by all means as he is not establishing amy form of actual independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  01:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a vanity page on an unremarkable bureaucrat. Insufficient RS coverage to meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Page has more than enough references but the subject does not hold a position that meets general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.