Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navjivan (Neighbourhood)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that this subject should not be treated as a stand-alone article. The suggestion of redirection seems to have been rejected as inappropriate due to lack of mention in target article; a redirect (preferably at the better capitalization Navjivan (neighbourhood)) can be created and challenged if desired through normal editing processes. Hog Farm Talk 06:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Navjivan (Neighbourhood)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced since 2012. One sentence article. Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GEOLAND. Fairly small neighbourhood in Ahmedabad. Ahmedabad has 48 Wards (which denotes large neighbourhoods) in 7 Zones and Navjivan is not in them. See Zone/Ward list here or on Amdavad Municipal Corporation. A case similar to Articles for deletion/Kabirchowk and Articles for deletion/Anand Nagar (Ahmedabad). - Nizil (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nizil (talk) 05:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ahmedabad: A bold redirect should have been enough, but since we are here, let's go ahead with this.  Java Hurricane  05:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , there is no point in redirecting it to Ahmedabad either.-Nizil (talk) 06:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Why? If it's a neighborhood there I don't see why not to redirect.  Java Hurricane  06:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As per, Ab207.-Nizil (talk) 06:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There is currently consensus that this article should not be kept but less consensus about whether or not a redirect is appropriate under WP:ATD.
 * Delete per nom, unless someone proves that the place has a legal recognition. Redirecting an unsourced stub is not appropriate when its not even mentioned in the target article. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:10, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, mentioning this at the Ahmedabad article would be WP:UNDUEWEIGHT. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.