Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naxeex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Naxeex

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clear advertisement, linkedin as a source; not notable piece of promo Gavrover (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Cyprus.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 13:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Russia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nominator. No notability and a search for sources turned up nothing, so this could very much be promo.
 * λ Negative  MP1  18:00, 13 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete – Reeks of WP:COI. Press releases ain’t passin’ WP:GNG for me. TLA  (talk) 04:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hi! Article creator here. While I am sad that the article got nominated for deletion, I can understand why. I initially thought of making an article for the company because it was a pretty popular developer during my childhood days and i actually thought that was enough for it to be notable. So I made it. However, there was massive revisions courtesy of the Naxeex founder making a wikipedia profile and making edits, removing some of my references, and turning it into a big fat ad. I agree that now I can see that making it was a bad idea. I sincerely apologize. Bulls123 (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * no need to apologize, totally makes sense. Seems like the article has WP:COI after your creation. TLA  (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment  Partially related but you edited sourcing about Naxeex in this edit on Battleboarding. Any comment or was that scoop.it ref reliable? IgelRM (talk) 04:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.