Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayeem (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm going with the judgement of those who can read the sources in their native language, to evaluate both the WP:N and WP:RS aspects. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Nayeem (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This actor Fails WP:NACTOR as lack of any notable movie, and fails WP:GNG as well. His most popular movie Chandni fails our WP:NFILM. Currently he is a director, with no notable work. The sources (including Bengali language) don't provide a significant coverage to this person other than Passing mention or trivial coverage related to the promotion of his first film. (Note: Do not confuse him with another young Bangladeshi actor with same name.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  20:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep He was a popular film actor in Bangladesh. Most of his movie got huge response. The Nayem-Shabnaz pair was most populer pair on Bangladeshi film industry.  Niloy   (keep talking) 14:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi User:NishorgaNiloy Please see the WP:AAD section WP:ILIKEIT. Just stating your opinion is not enough, WP:SIGCOV or WP:NACTOR needs to be proved with appropriate sources that are missing. I have already followed WP:BEFORE and yet I am open to withdraw the nomination if we can prove notabilty. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  15:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Altaf  ( talk )  18:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep-The nomination fails WP:BEFORE by a mile or so.
 * This source states:--
 * ঢাকাই চলচ্চিত্রের একটি আলোকিত অধ্যায়ের সঙ্গে জড়িয়ে আছে নাঈম-শাবনাজের নাম। নব্বয়ের দশকে তুমুল জনপ্রিয় এ জুটি দীর্ঘদিনে হল মিডিয়া থেকে দূরে রয়েছেন।---The names of Nayeem and Shabnaj are associated with a glorious phase of the Dhaka-film-industry.The pair, who was immensely popular during the 90s have maintained seclusion from the media, for a very long time.
 * নাঈম-শাবনাজ জুটির চলচ্চিত্রে অভিষেক হয় এ সিনেমাটির মাধ্যমে। সে সময় চলচ্চিত্রটি দারুণ ব্যবসায়িক সফলতা পায়। এর পর এ জুটি বহু দর্শকপ্রিয় চলচ্চিত্র উপহার দিয়েছেন।--The pair debuted in the cinema (Chadni, 1991) which was quite successful commercially.Post their debut, the pair has acted in multiple movies, which have been well-received by the audience.
 * This states:-
 * নব্বই দশকের জনপ্রিয় নায়ক নাঈম।........বেশ কিছু ছবিতে অভিনয় করে দর্শক প্রিয়তা লাভ করেন।--Nayeem was a popular actor of the 90s. He attained the adoration of the cine-goer-audience, courtesy his acting skills.

&#x222F; WBG converse 03:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Multiple off-line hits are located across Bengali dailies of the 90s.
 * Mentions in Tabloids as WBG listed above dont help in establishing any WP:SIGCOV. saying multiple hits exist also is of no value, specially when other actors with same name exist. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  06:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Tabloid? Have you gone bat-shit crazy or are you trolling?
 * This states দেশীয় চলচ্চিত্রের অন্যতম সফল তারকা জুটি, তারকা দম্পতি এবং নব্বই দশকের তরুণ তরুণীর হৃদয়ে ঝড় তোলা জুটি নাইম শাবনাজ--One of the most successful pairs of the film-industry and heart-throb of the 90s.
 * This states:-কয়েক বছরের চলচ্চিত্রে ক্যারিয়ারে তাঁরা জুটি হয়ে অভিনয় করেন ২০টির মতো ছবিতে। এর মধ্যে উল্লেখযোগ্য হচ্ছে— ‘জিদ’, ‘লাভ’, ‘চোখে চোখে’, ‘অনুতপ্ত’, ‘বিষের বাঁশি’, ‘সোনিয়া’, ‘টাকার অহংকার’, ‘সাক্ষাৎ’ ও ‘ঘরে ঘরে যুদ্ধ’।--In a career spanning a few years, the pair acted in around 20 films.Some mention-able ones are:- ................. Easily manages to secure a NACTOR pass for the subject.
 * This states নাঈম-শাবনাজ অতিনীত অধিকাংশ ছবিই ছিল ব্যবসা সফল। --Most of the films acted upon by naeem-Shabnaj pair was commercially successful.
 * This states:--শাবনাজ-নাঈম জুটি আসেন চাঁদনী ছবি দিয়ে। চাঁদনী ছবি সে সময় তোলপাড় করে ফেলে সিনেপাড়া থেকে সারাদেশ। বাংলা চলচ্চিত্রে তিনি নবাজাদা হিসেবেই পরিচিত ছিলেন।--Shabnaz-Naeem pair arrived in the film-scape with Chadni, which created ripples across the entire country. Naeem was revered as the prince of the Bangladesh film industry.
 * This states:--movies like Chandni (1991) which launched newcomers Shabnaz and Nayeem to super-stardom.
 * You ought not expect to locate significant coverage of the subject, in online news-sources, given there was hardly any internet-penetration in the country in the 90s and that he has led a secluded life, away from the spotlight, post millenium.
 * A database locates multiple hits for Nayeem + S(h)abnaz in The Daily Star (pre-1995) but it will need some efforts to retrieve them. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:04, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * WBG as I warned you on ur talk, your Conduct at AfDs with all these ad hominems is getting awful lately, If you cannot follow WP:CIVIL and are going to dish up ad hominems such as this and, you should consider staying away from AFDs. Folks dont come to AfDs to listen to your venomous ad hominems.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  08:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the warning, about which I can't care any less.Back to content, please. &#x222F; WBG converse 08:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This states:--movies like Chandni (1991) which launched newcomers Shabnaz and Nayeem to super-stardom.
 * You ought not expect to locate significant coverage of the subject, in online news-sources, given there was hardly any internet-penetration in the country in the 90s and that he has led a secluded life, away from the spotlight, post millenium.
 * A database locates multiple hits for Nayeem + S(h)abnaz in The Daily Star (pre-1995) but it will need some efforts to retrieve them. &#x222F; WBG converse 07:04, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * WBG as I warned you on ur talk, your Conduct at AfDs with all these ad hominems is getting awful lately, If you cannot follow WP:CIVIL and are going to dish up ad hominems such as this and, you should consider staying away from AFDs. Folks dont come to AfDs to listen to your venomous ad hominems.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  08:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the warning, about which I can't care any less.Back to content, please. &#x222F; WBG converse 08:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per . —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  16:00, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep & quick close -- Yes it fails WP:BEFORE by a long shot. It is surprising that it was even nominated. -- nafSadh did say 18:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Bengali sources provided by other users. - Editor General of Wiki (talk) 16:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment requesting a relist due to pile on votes. see WP:PER User X -- D Big X ray ᗙ  19:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * ??? Come on, you're requesting a relist because the discussion isn't going the way that you'd like. Striker force Talk 20:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Pile on !votes? WBG just said it better than I could have. No point repeating the same argument twice. There is no reason to relist in the absence of a strong argument to delete. Consensus seems to be that WBG has thoroughly rebutted the nominator's argument, and the only other delete !vote is "per nom". There appears little reason to waste additional time of experienced editors relisting this for another week's discussion. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WBoG and others before me. The endorsement of the Bengali sources by an editor with whom I'm familiar and of whom I trust their judgment confirms my initial thoughts to keep. Striker force Talk 20:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment The articles are kept because of them passing WP:NACTOR or clear WP:SIGCOV not because some site calls the actor "heartthrob", "hottie", "creator of ripples". It is expected that PR firm of the actor and the PR firm of the production house will be used, and the coverage has to be analyzed with this in mind. NACTOR Demands  significant roles in multiple notable films. this actor fails to have even one.  It demands  significant "cult" following. no such indication. and finally there is no indication that this acotor has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  20:46, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.