Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayrok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Nayrok

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable musician with no albums released. Only off-wiki reference used here has the statement "Information from the artist's site" at the bottom, and seems to be a simple local band list service. May become notable in the future, but who knows? Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--not notable (yet). Drmies (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails several points of WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. I was unable to find any google news hits for this person and they are an unpublished artist by any notable record company. As far as I can tell, the only pages that truly link to this person as part of them being the primary topic is a myspace page and a few articles by non-notable media. This artist may become big later on in life, and should that happen the article may be recreated, but until they have not WP:CRYSTAL prevails. Mkdw talk 22:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete might pass WP:MUSIC someday, but not yet: unsigned and has no releases. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  fetch  comms  ☛ 03:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:Music to the point of vanity. Will indeed become notable if her first record sells by the million but we don't do up and coming without several non trivial secondary sources, of which I can find none. --A1octopus (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as she fails WP:MUSICBIO. Good luck to her, she might pass the guidelines someday, but it's premature at this point in time.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  00:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.