Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naz Choudhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Naz Choudhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Plainly promotional, sources are primary (interviews), mention the subject only in passing, or don't actually pertain to the subject at all. Previous PROD contested by User:Aspects. Domeditrix (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Domeditrix (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Besides the article being promotional - that lede - nearly all of his "notability" falls under WP:NOTINHERITED (involvement with a notable concert, performed on a notable show, etc.) --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)


 * delete after performing a search, all I could find was coverage primary sources (either of the shows, or his interviews), the secondary sources are non-reliable telly/gossip sites. In short, subject fails WP:NCREATIVE, and as they dont have significant coverage in reliable sources, subject fails WP:GNG as well. Talking about article being promotional, it was that way even in 2012. I didnt go further in history. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NCREATIVE and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:29, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL and WP:OUTCOMES. This appears to be a very ordinary producer of shows, one of thousands, and we almost always delete pages about producers. Likewise, his appearance on reality television shows does not prove notability - literally thousands of Britons compete annually on such TV shows. Bearian (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)]
 * Delete - Every sentence is cited way too much. Also, there are a lot of primary sources. Analog Horror, (Communicate) 01:49, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same above reasons but I would also suggest that his dance company Bolly Flex (or is it FlexFX?) are potentially worthy of a Wikipedia page, in which Naz could be mentioned as a founder/director. In cleaning up the links most of them were connected with their performances, not Naz. It was particularly infuriating that he had apparently edited the link descriptions to mention his name, even if the articles were not about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.227.132.9 (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you think the company meets the notability guidelines (I'm not certain that it does), feel free to make the page and submit it through Articles for Creation. To create an article, however, you need to make an account (apologies if you have one and just aren't logged in). Domeditrix (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted, thanks. I don't have an account but felt so strongly about this entry that I ended up venturing into editing. Happy to leave the rest of the future edits and decisions to the rest of you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.227.132.9 (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.