Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazi Sharks (or why Top Gear haven't done their arithmetic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Nazi Sharks (or why Top Gear haven&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article seems to be about a satiric memorandum prepared for an organization, but the paper would appear to be either non-notable or an unencyclopedic topic, or possibly even a hoax. Ssilvers (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It isn't a hoax. It is a paper with a stupid name. I don't think it is notable, yet.  Greglocock (talk) 02:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 03:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable (I've not even heard of it until today when looking at the article). Bidgee (talk) 04:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable paper. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 05:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If I may, I wrote Nazi Sharks, and though it was a nice thought to try to include it, it certainly isn't notable. While the humour and title were for the audience, the figures are sound. theluckyman1976 —Preceding undated comment added 13:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe speedy? - It's cute, but in my mind the sources don't quite cut it. And, um,someone claiming to be the the author saying it shouln't be here really isn't a good sign. Artw (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete.. speedy? Clearly not notable. Nevard (talk) 06:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy if you wish. It's popular by the standards of the Claverton Group but so far as I know hasn't appeared or been sourced anywhere else - even using the bracketed version of the name Theluckyman1976 (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.