Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazia Hassan Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Abundance of sources. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  05:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nazia Hassan Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing in my searches. Fails WP:GNG. Much is about Nazia Hassan. Störm  (talk)  19:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 20:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 20:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  20:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep and a recommendation for the user to slow down their AFD submitting. A quick google search reveals plenty of notable articles in independent media about the foundation. I will add them here and the submitter, Storm, can add them in order to improve the article. https://images.dawn.com/news/1176170, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/english/hollywood/news/Nazia-Hassan-Foundation-to-be-set-up-next-month/articleshow/18044381.cms, http://www.rediff.com/movies/report/meera/20031016.htm, https://www.hipinpakistan.com/news/1150629 .Egaoblai (talk) 08:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Appreciate your work. But we need reliable sources whereas last two of your are 'not reliable' per WP:RS. There is not enough coverage for stand-alone article instead there are some trivial mentions so this fails WP:NORG (which you want to read). ATD is to redirect to Nazia Hassan. Störm   (talk)  09:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Other coverage of the organisation here     . And agree with 's comment (see Administrators noticeboard/Incidents).  Mar4d  ( talk ) 09:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)]
 * A think a *Procedural block* on the recent slew of articles for deletion submitted about Pakistani related NGOS is needed. The user is clearly not following WP:BEFORE.Egaoblai (talk) 11:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep The article should be kept for the above stated reasons and it should be improved with references. ATM, the article is unreferenced.  sami  talk 09:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep –Because absence of reference in an article is cannot strip it of notability and is invalid reason for deletion per this existing guideline. And passing GNG is sure here; apart from the multiple sources from editors above (disproving your "nothing in my search") here is another from Pakistan's Tribune and more indepth report from UAE's respected paper Khaleej Times. I also join the editors above to advise the nom to heed this ANI advise and stop this "tagerted" and plethoric nomination which both disrupt the fair process and deprive editors of time to asses the merit of each nomination due to huge number. I am afraid another ANI thread about the same problem may not end up with another advise only. –Ammarpad (talk) 11:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.