Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naziyah Mahmood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Naziyah Mahmood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable - promotional article. This was a contested PROD by the original editor with none of the underlying concerns being met. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I founded zero search results with that person completely failing GNG. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 15:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of this afd.Coolabahapple (talk) 00:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete (provisional). Does not pass WP:Prof. I am unable to comment on actress/model notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Google search didn't turn up a single mention in a reliable sources, but many similarly worded pieces of (self?) promotion in non-RSes. Academic career does not come close to meeting WP:PROF. Joe Roe (talk) 11:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep pending source search. WP:BASIC is best applied to someone with multiple jobs, her work as an academic "stacks" with other coverage by neutral, reliable third-party sources.  The question is if all together get us to adequately significant. I'm giving this one the benefit of the doubt for now.   Montanabw (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I can find nothing that shows she meets the notability criteria of any specialty. She definitely does not meet the notability criteria for martial artists (see WP:MANOTE).  Every reference I see appears to be remarkably similar in wording.  I find myself just on the other side of the fence from Montanabw because I don't see quite enough to agree she meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.