Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazmul Hoque Nadwi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Nazmul Hoque Nadwi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Being a professor or writing journal articles does not make one notable. The person does not have significant coverage in reliable sources to be considered notable. Fails WP:GNG and Notability (academics) Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete not every academic is notable and these is no indication that this academic is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG No significant coverage of his work in secondary sources. Held minor positions at minor academic and non academic institutions. Not notable. Does not pass WP:PROF & WP:AUTHOR. Fails WP:GNG as well. Mosesheron (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * GNG is the wrong notability criterion. To make a more useful contribution to this discussion, you should evaluate against the criteria of WP:PROF instead. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Oh I did. Actually, It should read "Fails GNG as well". But I see how that gave you the wrong impression. Mosesheron (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Dean is too low an administrative position to pass WP:PROF and I didn't find heavy citations to his works that would allow a pass of #C1. The article mentions book publications, but we need reviews or other in-depth publications by others about those books to make a case for WP:AUTHOR, and the article presents none. I think there may be a language barrier for me to find sources, though, so I'd be open to changing my mind if someone else finds multiple reliably-published reviews of multiple books. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing substantial comes up in a cross-language search in Bangla or Arabic. Maybe I'm not looking in the right places. Mosesheron (talk) 20:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.