Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ndukwe Onuoha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Ndukwe Onuoha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

spammy autobio about a non-notable person, only sources are PR types and passing mentions, nothing that indicates actual notability. Praxidicae (talk) 19:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete — Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources & fails to satisfy any known notability criteria for inclusion. Celestina007 (talk) 22:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. There's no significant coverage to indicate notability. Less Unless (talk) 16:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MILL and WP:GNG. In 2006, this could have been excused, but in 2020, everybody knows we are not LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 15:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I have added two references, one of which provides in-depth coverage, but that article makes it clear that Onuoha invited the journalists to hear his latest album and I don't think the coverage is therefore independent of the subject. As a seasoned PR professional, he knows what he's doing. But the appeal on the article talk page that he is important, and accusing editors of racial prejudice, doesn't help. SPA, COI editor with clear, close links to the subject, certainly UPE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water  (talk)  16:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.