Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeST Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Quest Global. czar ⨹   05:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

NeST Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't Meet Wikipedia notability guidelines Lakun.patra (talk) 10:10, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:37, 26 November 2014 (UTC)



 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect' to Quest Global - Software company article of unclear notability. The ref provided is RS, but shows only that the company was acquired by Quest Global. I found one other article on the acquisition, but no further significant coverage. These articles are not sufficient to establish notability independent of the now-parent company. This article's creator is an SPA, so it is possibly promotional in nature.Dialectric (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete -- Subject is not notable at all WP:N. Clearly no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources WP:ORG. Articles about the take over of the company are not independent as they are PR for the company taking them over Quest Global who are also don't fulfill WP:ORG in my opinion. Also Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages WP:NOTCATALOG. Clearly promotional seeking to look neutral by an SPA. Many reasons for deletion. Thanks -- Marksterdam (talk) 10:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete -- No substantive references (online or print) from reliable media sources. --Cryptodd (talk) 22:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.