Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neaate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Neaate

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Hoax: no occurrence of the name or variants in any source. The name is certainly not Greek, nor do Cycladic artifacts include such stones to my knowledge. The sources provided are entirely irrelevant to the subject. Constantine  ✍  15:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not finding any sources for this topic at all. There certainly doesn't seem to be anything in the Wilamowitz paper cited as the first source, and the edition of Lycophron on my shelves contains no word resembling this. Unless something substantive and relevant is adduced, the article fails WP:V. Deor (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.