Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Ainley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Neal Ainley

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

the only notability is misdemeanor crimes, for which the only penalty was probation. fails WP:BLP1E / WP:CRIME -- The Red Pen of Doom  18:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)   I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete clear WP:BLP1E. Chillllls (talk) 20:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. Eeekster (talk) 00:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The following comment by the article's creator appears on the article's talk page: "If your name is listed in a report by Kenneth Starr and page A01 for the Washington Post notability has been met." The person's notability is as a prosecution witness in a criminal case related to a significant political scandal. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * the article's creator may have stated that as criteria for notability, however the actual policy outlines somewhat different criteria which are the ones which we should be utilizing. -- The Red Pen of Doom  04:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. No significant coverage to overcome either WP:BLP1E or WP:CRIME. That fact he had a few blurbs in major press sources about the single event is insufficient. In this instance, we have the luxury of knowing there has not been persistent coverage since the event.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.