Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Roese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Neal Roese


Bump from speedy. —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-29 04:08Z 


 * Delete. Wikipedia has a guideline WP:AB about autobiography. This article may violate it, since the user is named Nroese and this is the only article s/he has edited. The danger with being too permissive here is of course an escalating self-promotion phenomenon. --IslandGyrl 04:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - violates WP:AUTO. MER-C 05:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:COI. Just misses a speedy recommendation with its unsourced assertion of notability. B.Wind 06:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't consider WP:AUTO or WP:COI to be deletion criteria in themselves, but if the book he'd written had been reviewed seriously I'd consider whether he met WP:PROF. I don't believe he does even with this particular book. --Dhartung | Talk 07:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Autobio + no serious indication that he meets WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Pascal.Tesson 07:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.