Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neal Zaslavsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  01:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Neal Zaslavsky

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:BIO. Bongo  matic  06:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the lack of third-party, reliable sources. A Google search returns mainly social-networking sites such as LinkedIn, Plaxo, ZoomInfo, etc. A Google Books search returns one result, which is a passing mention that does not establish notability. Cunard (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Recused (unblocking admin) - NN-Bio - A l is o n  ❤ 06:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable. COI. Netalarm   talk  06:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence that they meet our inclusion standards and improperly sourced BLPs are a really bad idea Spartaz Humbug! 07:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim of notability. Fails WP:BIO. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 14:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable person per our guidelines. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – No evidence individual meets WP:BIO criteria.  ttonyb  (talk) 21:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:COI. Notability. WP:RS. Fails all three Manning (talk) 01:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I am sure that his circumstances will soon change so that he meets our criteria for inclusion; until that time, however, it would be premature of us to have an article on him. Regretful delete'. DS (talk) 01:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I despise your wp:notability. Debresser (talk) 16:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.