Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neasi-Weber International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:45, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Neasi-Weber International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject appears to be a non-notable software company. The organization lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources, and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  01:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another business that develops software solutions for publishers advertising on Wikipedia.  They apparently make software for running newspapers, and that's way too back-office for a stand alone article in the absence of some kind of showing of significant effect on history, technology, or culture. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 01:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete—I could find one trivial mention in a newspaper, other than that no coverage in WP:RS. Delete per nom and above.   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 21:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.