Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neatx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica1000 02:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Neatx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Software was last updated 4 years go. Indolering (talk) 22:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. That's not a valid deletion rationale.  Notability isn't temporary.  I figured there wasn't much chance that this would be notable, but I found significant coverage: zdnet, Linux Magazine, H-Online, Heise.de, Computer World.  There might be more, but I stopped after that.  I wouldn't be opposed to merging this to another article, but it's notable enough to survive deletion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, but improve. Notability seems to be clearly established. The article could use significant improvement, but deletion does not seem appropriate. —Josh3580talk/hist 07:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'd say speedy due to the lack of anything approaching a valid deletion rationale, but there we go. Plenty of good sources presented here as well. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 09:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.