Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebojša Koharović


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Nebojša Koharović

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:DIPLOMAT, simply being an ambassador does not mean you get an automatic WP article. does not seem to be any significant coverage of doing anything more. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Possibly notable as an academic and politician as well. See this page: http://www.mvpei.hr/MVP.asp?pcpid=1610  -- Eastmain (talk) 05:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * does not appear to have held an actual political position. not much on gscholar either so fails WP:PROF. LibStar (talk) 05:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 05:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Weak delete. Thanks for placing this here and notifying, Eastmain. Although I strongly push and promote/create Croatian articles, this entry seems to me not a very good one. Simply being an ambassador is not enough (per nom), I never heard of this person (I know, that is no indication, just though I would throw it in), and I can't seem to find significant reliable coverage. Sources and significance provided I will change my mind. Turqoise127 (talk) 18:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject was formerly Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Croatian government, and his stint as ambassador to Poland attracted media coverage, with these articles being about him:. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:56, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * those articles are in Polish so it's hard to determine how in depth the coverage is. but you would expect ambassadors to attend events, meeting, make comments in the media and so on which is part of their job. also it seems he was promoted to ambassador from the "assistant minister" position according to this. I'm not sure if the Assistant Minister means an actual Government elected position or parliamentarian. LibStar (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Strong keep Obviously notable. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 14:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * on the basis of? please explain why. otherwise WP:ITSNOTABLE. do you speak Polish? did you understand those references supplied by Phil Bridger? or do you speak Croatian and have found sources in Croatian?LibStar (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Keep he's a stub so...Red Hurley (talk) 21:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.