Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebojsa Stanojevic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per consensus.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Nebojsa Stanojevic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This biography of a living person was created and edited last month by Digger3d, NebojsaStanojevic, 92.36.189.68, and Kesakoxxxl. RGTraynor tagged it for deletion last week as per WP:CSD: blatant advertising (I deleted and undeleted it, DGG deleted it). As per the discussion on *User talk:Athaenara#Nebojsa Stanojevic, I undeleted it today to list it for wider discussion here. — Athaenara ✉  20:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * *(Now in User talk:Athaenara/Archive 6.)  – Athaenara ✉  17:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. The article does read like blatant self-promotion and notability is not established. The only independent source is the New York Times which merely includes this person in the list of credits as "Editor" (the article implies something more glamorous). I lean toward delete unless some independent sources for any of the claims can be found. --Regents Park (sink with my stocks) 21:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - outside of him being the second of two editors on a 2001 German comedy, I can't find any third-party reliable sources that mention him. Sounds to me like what USERFY was meant for. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 22:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 *  Very weak keep Delete Yeah... did another series of searches with various parameters. Blogs and SPS. Pity. only if the peacock can be removed from thaa article. I find some interesting sources that suggest there may be a notability as an author and ignoring the filmaker hype. Possible that this may be WP:ONEEVENT, so that's why my keep is so weak. Even the WP:ONEVENT is not covered.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I tried that search, but with the guy's name in quotes, and without blogspot.com, wikipedia, googlepages.com, digger3d.com, and video.google.com. Result: pretty much nothing. If you take out the WP:PEACOCK and WP:COI, there's nothing usable left. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 21:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.