Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nebula 19


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 14:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Nebula 19

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability. Not an area that greatly interests me so I stand to be corrected by editors with more knowledge, but it seems that a computer game that has just one (bad) review, the article's only source, and was self-published by its designer is unlikely to be notable. Article was created in 2018 and has not been edited since. Emeraude (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep There is another 1971 review in Issue 2 of The S&T Guide to Conflict Simulation Games, Periodicals and Publications in Print, p.8. (S&T Guide was a spin-off publication of Strategy & Tactics.) Unfortunately I have not yet been able to locate a copy of Issue 2, but the review is listed in Games, Issue 7, p 13 here.Guinness323 (talk) 01:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Two reviews meet the minimum required by GNG, I think. Although there is the question of the quality of the review; I'd like to confirm that they are more than a tiny paragraph long. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Guinness323. BOZ (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.