Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 21:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Necare

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 02:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 03:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: I did a simple search in Google for Necare and it returned a lot of sources. The band has profile in a lot of music site, about metal or not   . There are reviews about its last album  . One can find interviews too  . Surely the band satisfies WP:BAND#1.Victor Silveira (talk) 04:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but you need to re-read "WP:BAND" before use it as an argument for non-deletion. Sing365.com is just mirroring a biography, taken from the band's now defunct official website. NME.com is using Wikipedia as source (the same biography). The other sources also fails the notability criteria. See also WP:SOURCESEARCH.--  C  anniba loki  03:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Cannibaloki, I read a lot of times WP:BAND, but you are right about Sing365 and NME. However, the other sources are reliable. If you do not think so, say the reasons, please. Don't say "they are not reliable sources" only, because these words alone are not self-justified, right? Victor Silveira (talk) 03:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And about not citing the source, I am not the first ot last to do it. In fact, I do not do it usually, however if you read what I wrote before you write your comment, you will see I'm busy these days. So, please, don't judge people before you know the whole context, right? Victor Silveira (talk) 03:21, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep They did an interview in a reliable source media.   D r e a m Focus  12:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I found a review published by Exclaim! magazine.--  C  anniba loki  03:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Not much to add; here is a short blurb on the group's singer contributing guest vocals for another band's album. Per above, there appears to be just enough sources to satisfy WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 17:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: All of us found reliable sources for this band. Probabily, it is not so difficult to find more, unfortunately I can not do it this week. However, I think all these sources are sufficient to give notability to the band. I have no doubt about it!Victor Silveira (talk) 23:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I edited and expanded the article, including in it the sources listed above. Victor Silveira (talk) 07:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Though they only have one never charted album listed on Billboard, it seems that they have significant coverage in other areas, so they pass WP:BAND. ArcAngel (talk) 07:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.