Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neck crank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn after re-write. Mind matrix  17:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Neck crank
The term "crank" is not sufficiently developed in the context in which this is used and is currently address in Hold (grappling) Rorybowman 22:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This concept is discussed in a more thorough manner in the wrestling and martial arts sections. -- (aeropagitica) [[Image:Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg|25px|UK]] 01:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Rorybowman and (aeropagitica) --Quarl 01:13, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I can write an article about neck cranks(neck locks). Probably 2-3 paragraphs with a picture. I've got a a link to a study about torsional pressure applied to the neck and spine. ---Marcus- 13:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Finished I've written a short article about this subject. I won't remove the "nominated for deletion notice", until someone endorses my writing. ---Marcus- 12:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP: I am the one who originally suggested the delete, but this article addresses my original concern. New article is substantive and about as precise as the subject and current usage allows. Rorybowman 16:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable, well-known technique. Article as been improved. Shawnc 03:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.