Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necroeconomics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Necroeconomics
Appears to be original research, cites only to article author's paper on iUniverse. Also including redirect page Necroeconomy. NawlinWiki 14:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment only: please see Village_pump_(assistance). For now, I agree it looks like OR. Lupo 14:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's unsourced original research compounding a neologism. (Side note: it's created by User:Vladimer Papava, which means if this really is Mr.Papava (not likely), there's a vanity issue - and if it's not Mr.Papava, there's a WP:USERNAME issue.) wikipediatrix 15:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The topic (transition from stagnant command economy) itself is an interesting phenomenon but this low quality essay makes only disservice to it. Pavel Vozenilek 22:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.