Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necron (Warhammer 40,000)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Warhammer 40,000. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Necron (Warhammer 40,000)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Currently the article is 100% WP:OR/WP:FANCRUFT (plot summary) based on primary sources (Games Workshop and affiliates). This fictional race seems to fail the requirements of WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. BEFORE found only (which is the best source I found so far, as it discusses the products real world history a little), everything else I found is much worse - a few pages which are just plot summary recapas and some game guides on 'how to play with Necron faction'. This is interesting but not independent. Overall, I am not seeing much to help this with WP:SIGCOV; even The Gamer source contains little we can salvage outside few sentences about when the faction was created (which can be covered in the main WH40k article at Warhammer_40,000 perfectly well). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Warhammer_40,000, and perhaps merge a small amount (e.g. a few sentences!) of the relevant content there. This fictional race isn't notable enough to sustain a separate article, as Piotr said above. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 10:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect Agree with User :Firefly. I can remember scarabs when I use to play but Necrons I barely remember them. There is some minor coverage in The Gamer, and some other gaming sites but not enough SIGCOV for a separate article.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Warhammer_40,000 per Firefly, entirely Wikia material that does not demonstrate standalone notability.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect as consensus to WP:PRESERVE. This could be covered in a few sentences. No WP:SIGCOV. Archrogue (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.