Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necronomicon (Sydney, Australia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Necronomicon (Sydney, Australia)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This convention does not appear to be notable, as it has not been (as near as I can tell) the subject of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources as outlined at WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  14:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

 Delete. Seems non-notable and isn't going to become so anytime soon. Ducknish (talk) 20:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Whpq - No coverage in Reliable Sources, WP:GNG  D u s t i *poke* 03:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.