Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necrosexual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Necrosexual...I shutter. ---J.S (T/C) 04:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Necrosexual

 * — (View AfD)

This is a nn neologism, 1890 ghits. Contested prod. MER-C 12:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Delete - I'm agreeing with everyone else on this one. Debaser23 14:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be there only to plug the band, going by the references. Tonywalton | Talk 12:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Googled it, found lots of refs to the band, couldent fimd any valid sources that it is anything other than a neologism. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * nn neologism; almost all hits refer to the band, but there are a few other references which use the term as a synonym of "necrophile". If this is to be kept at all, it should be redirected to necrophilia; otherwise, delete, and salt if attempts are made to create it. -- The Anome 12:45, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - the above comments pretty much nail it: non-notable neologism. Jayden54 13:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete-as failing WP:NEO.-- danntm T C 18:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. A new and rarely used term. In case the term is found to be official, redirect to necrophilia as it doesn't seem to differ much from it.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   19:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with necrophilia. Necrophilia is somewhat taboo topic, so I wouldn't expect to have many call themselves necrosexuals, the usage is interesting though. Valters 20:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Noclip 21:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. NeoJustin 21:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. Danny Lilithborne 23:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.