Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ned's Declassified Fairly Survivial Guide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g5, banned user; g1, nonsense. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Ned's Declassified Fairly Survivial Guide
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fictional series created by a known vandal, would put it up for speedy deletion but doesn't fit the criteria. treelo talk 01:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax per nom. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as vandalism. User has been tagged as likely sock of User:Danny Daniel. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as vandalism. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I went ahead and blocked the creator, whose only other edits were to add similar hoaxes. Sock or not, clearly not a good-faith user here to help us build an encyclopedia. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * CSD - CSD as per above comment --Boss Big (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.