Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neda Kozić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  18:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Neda Kozić

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable former tennis player who fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG. The closest this former player comes to passing WP:NTENNIS is winning a $25K doubles title, however this came in 2008, after the cutoff for ITF titles was increased to $50k. My WP:BEFORE search only found which is a passing mention at best. Iffy★Chat -- 21:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, as I believe there is enough to satisfy GNG. [This], It is a sufficiently detailed report that he coached a tennis club in the USA. Also detailing information about his coaching career [another] but from what I remember these sorts of references were usually enough, despite her career not yet reaching the level required to satisfy the specific tennis player criteria. User:Vecihi91 (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I have started expanding the article. I do not have any more time to work on it now, but I hope I have shown that there is enough there. User:Vecihi91 (talk) 20:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem with the tennis club sources linked above for GNG purposes is that they are not independent of the subject, as the subject works for these tennis clubs. Upon further inspection, I completely missed which admitedly is significant coverage in a reliable source, but if this is the only one that exists, there isn't enough to meet GNG here. Iffy★Chat -- 13:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There is enough to satisfy GNG.  Sadkσ   (talk is cheap)  12:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - because of NW and Abendblatt Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.