Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nederlander Worldwide Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Nederlander Organization. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Nederlander Worldwide Entertainment

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not establish notability and appears to have been primarily edited by a COI account made by the corporation. Irbisgreif (talk) 14:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. The company has received some coverage, but it feels very weak to me. The article does not establish notability. I will frankly admit that this is a borderline case, and the article will need some work if it survives AfD. &mdash; QuantumEleven 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect and/or merge - The article is a copyright violation of the company's web site, created by a COI account for promotional purposes as noted above. A Gnews search for the company shows 87 hits from major publications on the company, but there is already a Nederlander Organization article. I would suggest redirecting this article to that one, as they are pretty much one and the same. Nederlander Worldwide Entertainment is simply distributing the Nederlander company's productions overseas. I wouldn't be entirely opposed to deletion either, but I think a redirect is more appropriate since the "Nederlander Worldwide Entertainment" name is known and might be searched for. It might also be worth adding a small section to the Nederlander Organization article about their worldwide distribution arm. --  At am a chat 15:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I missed the OTRS notice on the talk page, so it's not a copyvio. --  At am a chat 15:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect and/or merge – Not notable on its own, and the text is all copied from the corporate web site. At most it deserves a paragraph in the Nederlander Organization article. Rees11 (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * merge into the already existing article--a considerably fuller and better article. DGG (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect per the above, easiest solution. ukexpat (talk) 21:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge basic info + redirect to parent article = perfect solution. — Athaenara  ✉  09:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.