Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Need For Madness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Need For Madness

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This looks like an interesting game; in fact, I might like it someday. Unfortunately, I could not find any reliable sources that demonstrates this game's notability. All I found were fansites or sites that host the game. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find any reliable sources with significant coverage of the game. However, Google reveals an awful lot more than "fansites or sites that host the game." This seems to be a somewhat prominent game within the free browser-based game community (there's probably a more established phrase out there than "free browser-based game" :). That said, while I want to vote keep on this, I can't find any evidence of GNG-satisfying sourcing. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  06:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't delete I say this page contains alot of the stuff you would want to know. What I'm saying is that the page Happy Wheels has been deleted a lot of times, but it only has a little bit of information. Think about pages, like the homepage. Sometimes it has unaccurate stuff, but you never put it up for deletion. Thank you for taking the time to read this message — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeedForAMadness (talk • contribs) 19:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Search for sources came up empty. WP:COI also. --SubSeven (talk) 22:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.