Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Need for Madness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-26 15:03Z 

Need for Madness

 * — (View AfD)

The page is about a game unheard of by most people. Similar games do not have pages - so why does this one? The page is not written in an enclclopedic style - this content belongs elsewhere on the web. Flutefluteflute Talk Contributions 12:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. In addition to nom, given the content of the article, worth noting that WP is not a how-to manual. Robertissimo 12:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a game guide. MER-C 13:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 15:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable and a game guide. Koweja 15:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Bag it and bin it. Game guide and non-notable. The Kinslayer 16:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Clean-up The "tips" section is a clear game guide and does not belong there. It isn't written very well and needs some editing. I don't see any evidence of it being notable or non-notable, so I vote to clean it up rather then delete it. --Pinkkeith 16:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources to provide notability, fails WP:V. The game guide material could be cut out in 5 seconds flat, but when the game is non-notable there's no point. QuagmireDog 20:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, the developer's website (Alexa rank 29,701 ) has a stub here, as do some other games from RadicalPlay (all listed in its article) which are the in the same state as this one - no assertion of notability and no sources. QuagmireDog 20:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, the developer's website (Alexa rank 29,701 ) has a stub here, as do some other games from RadicalPlay (all listed in its article) which are the in the same state as this one - no assertion of notability and no sources. QuagmireDog 20:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

'Remake Game guide but sometimes useful, re-make it!
 * Delete - cruft, non-notable, no reliable sources, little if any assertion of notability, no sources at all, no sources to support notability, game guide, non-real-world perspective. Moreschi Deletion! 20:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, non-notable and written as a gameguide, complete with a long section on 'tips'. Also seems to be a bit of an advertisement, with a link to the developer's website in the introduction. --The Way 08:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable game guide. --Folantin 11:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.