Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needlz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Needlz
Contested prod. The artist fails WP:MUSIC and lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party sources. JBsupreme (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep appears to have notability in his specific area with verifiability of some of it | here. Although, I agree the article needs rewriting to include what precisely makes him notable (awards, etc). Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless proper sources for notability are added to the article. There are none now.--Boffob (talk) 21:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not finding proper sources for this biographical text even after checking the UK Google search provided above. RFerreira (talk) 21:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Question/Comment probably just being dense but, I was under the impression that it didn't matter whether the website is .co.uk or .com that as long as "search the web" was clicked the search was not limited to the UK persay. Jasynnash2 (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply: It does influence the order of the links shown. For example, if an article appeared both on the CNN and the BBC websites, UK Google would put the BBC link before the CNN one, and "regular" Google based in the US would do the opposite. So there's a "local source" preference. The same kind of preference occurs with languages. For example, Google.ca has both an English and a French version, and the same unconstrained search (all websites, all languages) will result in a different order of links: if Wikipedia has an article in each language, the first one to be listed will be according to the language preference.--Boffob (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for that clarification. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete article lacks the necessary reliable coverage for a biography, and more to the point continues to lack said sources days later. (jarbarf) (talk) 22:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.