Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neel Burton (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Per WP:HEY, consensus that the new sources added are sufficient for WP:NAUTHOR (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Neel Burton
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article concerns an academic who does not meet notability guidelines under WP:ACADEMIC JoshuaGrayy (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Psychiatry, Mauritius,  and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have cited some reviews in the article that show a pass of WP:AUTHOR. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I am still slightly on the fence though. On the one hand, I can see how this could meet WP:AUTHOR but on the other hand given (a) that many books within the field are reviewed by journals at the request of the author and (b) that, as mentioned in the previous NfD for this page, these books aren't generally considered "significant or well-known", I am still not sure whether it fully meets point 3 of WP:AUTHOR. I am still quite new to this though, so very happy to be told I'm wrong and defer to greater experience. JoshuaGrayy (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per WP:HEY. The book reviews are enough for a pass of WP:AUTHOR for me. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:AUTHOR. The person who loves reading (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.