Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neelam Kinarey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America1000 22:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Neelam Kinarey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article consists entirely of one infobox, one reference, and an eight-word lead. Not notable at all. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: It is challenging to find English-language refs for this show, but with a few minutes of WP:BEFORE, I have found four three not very good sources and one pretty good one. The show's Facebook page has 4,525 followers, for what it's worth. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Then if there's no references, then perhaps the article shouldn't be created. It's not necessary to create an article for every topic. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 03:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't follow your logic. There are references. Since there are English-language references, it seems likely that there are Urdu-language references that I am unable to find. I would rather give this article some time to develop with the help of any Pakistani Urdu-speaking editors we have here on en.WP. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Then if we should give time for the article to develop, it should be in the draft space, not the main space. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 04:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.