Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neelix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Despite the nomination this is all related to - The user is obviously not the articles subject and the user isn't the creator of this article so I'm wrapping this up as Speedy Keep, No objections to renomination at any given time. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Neelix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The entire article is directly sourced to primary sources, with no claim of significant notability as needs to established from outside RS. The article is written "in universe" and is therefore not encyclopedic. Legacypac (talk) 06:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  07:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. It is always dangerous to judge notability simply from what is in an article. Even a quick Google search would find sources such as, , , , , . --Michig (talk) 09:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources provided by Michig demonstrate notability. In any case, there are obvious alternatives to deletion which we favour per WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 23:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. "It only cites primary sources" is a common refrain at AfD, but per WP:PRIMARY and WP:WPNOTRS, primary sources are perfectly acceptable when the article includes "straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source", rather than interpretations or inferences based on those sources. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Let me guess: This Neelix created tens of thousands of lousy quantum space redirect portals, thereby granting justification to any zealous, uncautious targeting of that which bears his name? &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 18:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.