Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Agnihotri (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Neeraj Agnihotri
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Neeraj Agnihotri

Non-notable photographer. One previous article was deleted. See Articles for deletion/Neeraj Agnihotri. Analysis of the sources is probably not necessary, because this article is a stub that does not appear to be an improvement over the deleted article, but the sources have been checked, and are not independent:
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Photography,  and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Weak keep WP:CREATIVE says that anyone who had a major role in creating a body of work is notable. So it seems he like had a major role in creating Nashebaaz and therefore meets that criteria. That assumes that we'd consider the editor and cinematographer to qualify as a major role, I think we would. At least this deserves a discussion and not a speedy delete. CT55555 (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Update, I'm really struggling to find anything about him, so posting this as more of a comment than a !vote in the hope for more opinions. Still suggesting normal AfD rather than speedy, but I don't have a strong opinion about it... CT55555 (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @CT55555, I've declined the speedy deletion request on technical grounds, but WP:CREATIVE doesn't say what you think it says. It makes it clear that creatives still need to meet our notability rules, and just suggests that "anyone who had a major role in creating a body of work" is the sort of topic for which sources probably exist. The onus is still on those claiming notability to those sources. &#8209; Iridescent 05:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - I have checked the listed sources above,and they do not provide independent significant coverage of the subject. If the originator can find sources within six days, the Heymann principle applies.  Otherwise delete or draftify.  (But I will already have been counted as nominator.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. Expecting this entity to qualify as per WP:HEY is quite "too much". - Hatchens (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.