Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Arora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. Article already deleted at 22:38 on 7 April 2016 by "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria A7, G11" (non-admin closure)  &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  00:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Neeraj Arora

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a person whose only discernible claim of notability is as a creator of instructional YouTube videos -- which, as always, only becomes a claim of notability if and when reliable sources, namely media, start writing about his work as a creator of YouTube videos. But nothing like that has been shown here. A prior speedy for lacking a basic claim of notability was removed, with a source listed in the edit summary rather than being added to the article, but that source is actually about a different person who merely happens to have the same name as the subject of this article. Delete, without prejudice against creation of a new article about the other, potentially more notable, Neeraj Arora. Bearcat (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Quite clearly wikipedia being used as a brand building tool for business. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.