Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neglected Mario Characters (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Neglected Mario Characters
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable webcomic. This was previously taken to AFD back in 2006 and kept, but times have changed since then and these days we enforce our policies more thoroughly. This comic has never, as far as I can tell, been the subject of significant coverage from a reliable third-party source. The best source there is is a mention in this 1up.com article about the history of webcomics, and even that only covers it briefly. As a result, this article fails WP:WEB. Robofish (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough sources to demonstrate notability, and googling gives little past what the nom found, so it fails WP:WEB and WP:GNG. Alzarian16 (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless cleaned up and properly referenced. Stifle (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. I don't think it was notable then, and it certainly isn't now that our verifiability standards have tightened. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication this meets WP:WEB notability criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Beyond me how this survived the first one.  And, holy cow, the design of that web page was bad even in 1997.  Powers T 19:53, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 'Delete Go ahead. I don't really edit it anymore. SPKx (talk) 20:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless cleaned up. I'm going with Stifle on this one. CaptHayfever (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. Fails WP:WEB badly.  Nandesuka (talk) 04:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A total mess. Mostly unsourced WP:OR. The best potential source (1up.com) is a trivial mention in an unreliable source. I'll second Powers' on "Beyond me how this survived." Sharksaredangerous (talk) 21:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I also think that it should be salted. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.