Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neidermeyer's Mind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete due to no forthcoming sources. &mdash;Sean Whitton / 14:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Neidermeyer's Mind
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contains no reliable sources, and is purely original research, or speculation. Googled and couldn't find any pages that are considered a reliable source that provided coverage. dude527 (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete or at least Merge into Korn article. This is an article on a demo tape? If the tape were released later as an album (like the Beatles BBC recordings, etc.) then maybe an individual article. -- Quartermaster (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I vote merge, but only if proper citations are found. If no citations are found, then I vote delete. This was never re-released as an album, it was used for getting a record deal, and never released. dude527 (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia has articles for tons of demo tapes. If no citations can be found like there are on the articles for other demo tapes, then merge with Korn. Tezkag72 (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:WAX? Skomorokh  02:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
 * After reading the article I was about to call for it to be kept. The initial argument given in the nomination was quite weak; WP:PROBLEMS such as original research or undersourcing are irrelevant to the suitability of the inclusion of a topic in the encyclopaedia. The article, though uncited, is reasonably well-written and provides basic information and context to the subject, with appropriate templates and structure. The artist, Korn, is so notable that all of their releases are deserving of their own articles, in the spirit of WP:SERIES, regardless of whether they met the general notability guideline. However, after searching Google and the music resources thoroughly, checking for possible misspelling and alternate punctuation, I could find nothing more than lyrics pages, torrent downloads and forums. No self-published original research, no comprehensive treatment in fan pages, not even cursory listings in user-contributed music databases featured prominently in the search results, not even considering the complete absence of even trivial coverage in reliable sources. So, while the topic is notable, I regretfully move to delete the article as unverifiable, without prejudice to recreation if sources were to emerge. Skomorokh  02:16, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Merger I have changed my mind and now support a merger, with Korn (1994 album). -- KMFDM FAN (talk!) 21:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.