Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil A. Doherty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom, no support for deletion from other participants. (non-admin closure) – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Neil A. Doherty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I haven't found any irs with significant coverage. The subject works at Wharton School and everything I 've found was linked to it. Fails WP:GNG. Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. WP:GNG is irrelevant; the notability guideline here is WP:PROF, and as the holder of an endowed chair at a major institution, he passes criterion C5. Additionally, as one would expect from the holder of an endowed chair, his citation record is good enough for C1. And with multiple in-depth published reviews of multiple books easily found by searching JSTOR       and probably more elsewhere for more thorough searches, he also passes WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:PROF and WP:PROF. I haven't made a thorough search for book reviews that would count for WP:AUTHOR, but that's probably passed as well. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdraw I agree with the above mentioned on WP:PROF and gladly withdraw my nomination.Less Unless (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.