Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Anderson-Himmelspach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. S warm  ♠  20:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Neil Anderson-Himmelspach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional BLP sourced almost entirely to primary sources with exceptional claims not backed by the sources. No signs of significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) – czar   03:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A perfect example of someone who meets the CSD significance criteria but not WP:N.  Specifically, he fails WP:Notability (music); he does come close, but I don't think the Vanguard feature satisfies criterion #4.  Even if it did, he fails the other criteria, and he certainly doesn't meet any criteria of WP:NACADEMICS.  North of Eden (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - "Neil Anderson-Himmelspach" at News, Books, browser and highbeam only found passing mentions and nothing close to good sources.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.