Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Brown (athlete)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Neil Brown (athlete)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not competed at a sufficiently high level for inclusion1 Chris (talk) 06:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see where it meets WP:N.  Burner 0718  JibbaJabba!  06:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence he meets notability guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete he never reached the highest level of amateur sports and there isn't significant coverage of him in reliable sources.  GB fan  talk 14:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous voter, since he fails the amateur athlete criterion of competing at the highest level in his sport. He retired at age 20, so that doesn't establish much of a record. Although the remark about most promising athletic prospect is interesting, it's uncited, attributed to an unnamed coach, and supposed was said on one youth sports TV program. If there was an extremely high level of media coverage (i.e. the level of coverage that LeBron James got when he was in high school), then I could see the case for a special exception. But in this case, the one uncited TV program isn't even remotely close to LeBron James level hype. --JamesAM (talk) 22:52, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete obscure amateur athlete with no claim of notability. -Drdisque (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.