Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Cornrich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination Withdrawn. WP:TNT applies - thanks to for his work on the article ... I would have thought deleting and starting over would have been easiest, but he proved me wrong. Thanks again. (non-admin closure)  Go  Phightins  !  03:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Neil Cornrich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolute puffery obviously written by someone affiliated with Cornrich, a paid editor in all likelihood; while the aforementioned, in and of themselves, are not reasons for deletion, the fact that the article, as it stands, contains nothing useful that is not drivel that is blatantly biased indicates that, even if Cornrich meets GNG, which though he did receive some coverage, such as in these articles, is debatable ... he seems to qualify under criterion 4 as well as possibly criterion 8 of WP:DEL-REASON. I was going to simply strip the article of the promotional content into a one-to-two sentence stub, but there is too much spam here even just to do that.  Go  Phightins  !  04:38, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve through the normal editing process. If Cornrich paid for this article, he should ask for a refund, as any competent paid editor wouldn't list a slew of bare URLs as references, especially since most go back to Cornrich's own website. The fact that Cornrich is known to be publicity shy also speaks against paid editing. That being said, Cornrich is a notable figure in the business of NFL football, as a Google Books search shows, as well as the articles linked by the nominator.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  06:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep article needs a rewrite but there are references in the article showing news coverage. It needs work but I think something can be salvaged. (Update - I have made some changes and removed a section to the talk page) Acb314 (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Acb314 has gone to town on the article, so I don't know if WP:TNT needs to go into effect here.LM2000 (talk) 02:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.