Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Emilfarb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 18:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Neil Emilfarb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Note that, in the article, the Daily Mail source doesn't mention the subject at all and the CNN source is labelled (by CNN) to be unverified.  But even if all of the sources did meet the standards for reliable sourcing, we still would just have an article about a successful businessman. There's nothing particularly noteworthy about the instant subject.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:50, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The Daily Mail reference removed. I added two important projects by the investor that are making an impact on the Montenegro Economy. M-sosostris (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as I found a few links at News and browser but nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister   talk  07:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete- searches did not reveal enough in-depth coverage to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.