Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with a leave for speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 14:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Neil Faith

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails WP:BLP (verifiability, no original research) and no evidence that subject fulfills general notability guidelines. Nothing apart from the subject's own promotional material used as reference. I have removed links to the front pages of an internet forum and three news/fan sites which provided absolutely no information on the subject. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 14:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 14:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 14:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Better references have been added, this subject easily meets general notability requirements, and this article should not be deleted! wrestlingmark9999 Speak 10:02am, 20 January 2012 (ET) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

 I have added more better quality references, this subject easily meets general notability requirements, and this article should not be deleted! wrestlingmark9999 Speak 10:10am, 21 January 2012 (ET)

The person who suggested this page be deleted has not responded to any posts on this discussion page, or to messages sent to him on his talk page. Again, better references have been added and this article should not be deleted! wrestlingmark9999 Speak 8:15pm, 25 January 2012 (ET) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 09:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)



I have added more better quality references, this subject easily meets general notability requirements, and this article should not be deleted! wrestlingmark9999 Speak 10:59am, 29 January 2012 (ET) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.82.150 (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.