Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Lyseng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Neil Lyseng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator.   Ravenswing   10:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. NN player. Resolute 18:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or Redirect to List of Kansas City Scouts draft picks. This player was picked 23rd overall by Phoenix Roadrunners in the 1975 WHA Amateur Draft, and 38th overall by Kansas City Scouts in the 1975 NHL Entry Draft. Note: When this ice hockey bio article was created it clearly met the criteria for inclusion under NHOCKEY for playing over 100 fully pro games. Recently, however, the NHOCKEY bar has been raised, and this nominator has been on a tear to delete articles which now may fall short of the newly raised bar. The sheer volume of AfD nominations by this editor (45-plus and counting in the last four days alone) makes it impossible to fully research all of the articles to prove they meet GNG. Expecting any editor to properly research this large number of articles for GNG sources is not realistic or fair, especially when one considers that many of these AfDs require searching pre-Internet sources. Going straight to AfD with this many nominations, without first using PRODs or appropriate tagging, is disruptive. The nom should be reminded that deletion is a last resort, and per WP:BEFORE should only be used after other alternatives have been fully explored. Dolovis (talk) 03:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yet another in a string of bad-faith arguments from you Dolovis. You've been told a dozen times now that lower level leagues do not enjoy the arbitrary 100 game threshold for presumptive notability. Given you knew this before making this rebuttal, it becomes obvious that you are now resorting to lying outright as your defence of choice. Regardless, old criteria or new, NHOCKEY only presumes notability.  You still have to demonstrate a GNG pass.  And it is quite noteworthy that while you are whining about the number of AFDs created, you don't seem interested in actually demonstrating notability on any of them at this point.  It's hard to take your complaints about the existence of 45 AFDs seriously when, over those same four days, you've not touched even one of them. Resolute 05:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Or, in almost all of them, never at all. This article is an example; Dolovis hasn't edited it since he created it, nearly four months ago.   Ravenswing   07:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Delete. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. None of the leagues are considered a top professional league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Patken4 (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete A search turns up no sources to meet GNG. And NHOCKEY also has not been met. -DJSasso (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.