Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Montier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. No response from the "delete" side to the improvements. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Neil Montier

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Absolute self-promotion. Lack of verifiable third-party significant coverage. All links are vanity. WP:NOTFACEBOOK. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 14:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – Lacks GHITS and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO.  ttonyb  (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable because of a lack of reliable secondary sources Morgankevinj(talk) 23:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, a clear case of autobiography, but a fairly modest one: the claims made in it were clear and minor, some of them were already backed up with sources (despite what is said above) when I got to the article, and others among them were easily sourceable via the world's best-loved search engine. -- Hoary (talk) 01:04, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Given the changes in the article since the delete comments above a relist seems appropriate. Davewild (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.