Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Tetkowski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 05:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Neil Tetkowski

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Promotional, not educational: Article is a promotion created and edited by the artist and his friend/colleague
 * Unnecessary / non-notable: Article is not linked to ANYWHERE on Wikipedia.(WP:NOTABILITY)
 * Conflict of interest: Article is heavily subject to conflicts of interest per WP:CONFLICT, as the artist's and he both created it / edited it.
 * Lack of sources: It does not have a good amount of high quality sources to show it's worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia and was declined creation based on that previously. (WP:RS)
 * I propose delete due to the above reasons. -- Gokunks (Speak to me) 00:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.